University of Nebraska researcher James Pierce has delved further into the potential for 3D published assistive devices in’ Efficacy of Assistive Devices Made with Additive Manufacturing.’ He begins by stating that it is surprising there have not been more previous ventures into the use of devices like 3D printed splints and castings, despite the obvious need–and an enormous amount of traumata each year resulting in sprains and breaks.
The goal is to eliminate older, conventional methods that may promote healing but take more time in production, are expensive, and often result in uncomfortable, poorly-fitted devices. If you have endured wearing a splint or a casting or watched someone else try to deal with wearing one, then chances are you are nodding your head right now and getting fairly interested in hearing what 3D printing can do differently for orthopedic patients.
Pierce explores how all the most intrinsic the advantage of 3D printing could be used in creating customized medical devices, beginning with affordability–after all, healthcare is expensive, and cost drives many of our selections , not to mention controlling insurance coverage too. In words of design, the researcher was hoping to find a way to fabricate parametric assistive devices that could be made speedily. This is important in nearly any customer scenario, but especially when something is being created to fit a patient who may be in pain, whether acute or chronic.
Even more interesting about this research is the potential Pierce ensures for applications in space 😛 TAGEND
“Knowledge gained from this study will validate novel assistive devices which could be used in the treatment of musculoskeletal injury for astronauts’ both during spaceflight and after return to Earth, ” said Pierce. “These novel answers will require less expert intervention and less on-site modifications for fitting.”
Pierce states that it has already been noted in previous studies that 3D printing for these types of devices is significantly faster, but still there have been no parametric devices of this specific kind actually produced using AM methods, which should create a style for patients to recover more quickly, avoid further injury, and allow for better utilize of effort and materials. Initial data regarding a 26 -year-old male wearing a wrist orthosis presented results’ not significantly different’ from a conventionally constructed device.
The patient did say that the 3D published model was more comfy, and Pierce attributes this to the breathability of the design. The 3D printed version was also favor due to esthetics, featuring a more streamlined style, bright colors, and better design overall.
One of the most exciting aspects of 3D printing is that it allows users to challenge conventional the methodologies and promotes positive change for customers as well as a broad range of medical patients today who are benefiting from the use of 3D published medical models, a variety of different devices, and a vast number of forays into bioprinting too.
For patients mending from sprains and fractures, the usual visit to the doctor for X-rays and a casting made use of plaster may soon be a completely different experience. Find out more about additive manufacturing for parametric devices here, and check back for a full analysis of the study in April 2019.
What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts; join the discussion of this and other 3D print topics at 3DPrintBoard. com.
[Source/ Images: Efficacy of Assistive Devices Created with Additive Manufacturing]
Read more: 3dprint.com